What if it was a gay world?
Mar. 3rd, 2004 08:50 amI receive quite a bit of email from the Human Rights Campaign. Since all of this marriage stuff, I've been receiving more. This is totally fine with me - I actually enjoy reading it, and like to see where they're going with things, and well, I'm lazy and like having random news sent directly to me. Sometimes they have really wacky subject lines. Today's was, "What if it was a gay world?"
In actuality, that's the slogan of a new ad campaign they're beginning where they attempt a little "role-reversal" on opposite-sex couples in order to illustrate marriage benefits. But I got so irritated seeing that in my inbox. "What if it was a gay world?" Well, my answer was, "That would really suck, too."
Because I don't want a Gay World any more than I want a Straight World. For goodness sakes, people, I just want a world with civil rights for all under the law. I wish this wasn't such a polarized "Gay/Straight" thing, because if we could just get off of that for ten freaking minutes, we might actually make progress. Let's not isolate our heterosexual allies, hmm? Let's not let this little smokescreen divert us from the mess that man has made of our economy, our job market, our global image, our military, our schools, and our vocabulary. Sheesh!
I hope this doesn't mean I'll be bitchy all day. Yikes.
In actuality, that's the slogan of a new ad campaign they're beginning where they attempt a little "role-reversal" on opposite-sex couples in order to illustrate marriage benefits. But I got so irritated seeing that in my inbox. "What if it was a gay world?" Well, my answer was, "That would really suck, too."
Because I don't want a Gay World any more than I want a Straight World. For goodness sakes, people, I just want a world with civil rights for all under the law. I wish this wasn't such a polarized "Gay/Straight" thing, because if we could just get off of that for ten freaking minutes, we might actually make progress. Let's not isolate our heterosexual allies, hmm? Let's not let this little smokescreen divert us from the mess that man has made of our economy, our job market, our global image, our military, our schools, and our vocabulary. Sheesh!
I hope this doesn't mean I'll be bitchy all day. Yikes.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 01:51 pm (UTC)I hope you have a great day, sweets.
*big hug*
What if it was a smurf world?
Date: 2004-03-03 01:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 03:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 04:06 pm (UTC)Jeezus. The only thing I dislike more than the Human Rights Campaign is feeling like I have to align with them to get any action accomplished up in here.
Just my opinion...
Date: 2004-03-03 04:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 05:51 pm (UTC)Re: What if it was a smurf world?
Date: 2004-03-03 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 05:53 pm (UTC)Argh.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 05:53 pm (UTC)Or maybe I'm just paranoid.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 06:11 pm (UTC)heh.
btw,
no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 06:57 pm (UTC)Straight Plan just throws the whole thing into a sharper contrast. Like Queer Eye, Straight Plan pokes fun at the same stereotypical differences. But the contrast is made sharper because Straight Plan is such a blatant imitation of and reversal of Queer Eye's premise.
Before Straight Plan, the "us/them" was on a "hey, you're different from us" level. Straight Plan, from the shows premise to its name, adds the "if you can do it, so can we" factor.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-03 07:03 pm (UTC)Preach it, brother!
Date: 2004-03-03 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 12:30 am (UTC)Besides, labels are good for, say, jam. Not so much for people. Unless, of course, you happen to be Strawberry. in which case more power to you.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 02:54 am (UTC)I think labels are good for people to band together and identify themselves, but it becomes problematic because the labels tend to be based on one aspect of a person, which always leaves things more than a little skewed.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 02:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 02:58 am (UTC)Thanks, I'll check out
Smooches.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 02:59 am (UTC)Re: Just my opinion...
Date: 2004-03-04 03:00 am (UTC)It's hard when it's a minority trait, though, because you have to give /some/ acknowledgement to it or you will be assumed to be in the majority. It's like a catch-22... you don't want to /only/ be that, but you want to make sure to /be/ that, too.
Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 03:02 am (UTC)I know. It's sad that even in the queer community, you have to link up with the rich whiteys. Blecch. And even the HRC has that whole "fear of difference" thing going on. It's disheartening.
I still sent them money, though. They definitely have the power to keep this marriage thing going... even if I disagree with their tactics.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 03:06 am (UTC)p.s. When you see her, tell her I marched straight into my director's office and told them to hire her. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 03:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-04 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-06 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-06 03:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-06 08:21 pm (UTC)