Clothing "shift change"
Aug. 24th, 2010 11:01 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I spent a good chunk of time terrorizing my child today, making her try on all of the current pants in the drawer and then the new pants I bought for fall/school. I had to do this while talking to my aunt on the phone (who did not seem to get that the whining was not enhancing my phone experience, LOL) so it was fun on both ends, let me tell you. But we got it done and I got all of her pants tried on and I have learned something very interesting:
1. My kid is no longer super slim, either that or the Old Navy/Gap jeans get slimmer as they size up. When she wore 2T, they were trim but fit well. 3T was more form fitting but still okay. 4T/4 are TIGHT. Like, they actually fit her but they fit like I would have liked my jeans to fit in high school, which is to say they are not very conducive to climbing and squatting and playing. And Punk didn't like them, she complained they were too tight. Bleh. So there are a couple of pairs of jeans (which thankfully were hand-me-downs and I didn't buy them) that I doubt she will be wearing much, if at all.
2. I imagine I will be sending her to preschool in predominantly elastic-waist pants because they are easier for her to take down to go potty. She still struggles with pulling pants UP and no amount of coercing or encouraging seems to help, so I am going to leave that to preschool to teach. Honestly, after all of their crap, they should be teaching her three languages. But anyway, the bonus of the elastic-waist pants is that they fit forever, because they don't get tight. :)
3. Once again, Gymboree wins for the very generous (*cough* too generous) hip/waist sizing (ditto Hanna Anderssen) but thankfully they all have adjustable waist so I can pull them in a ton. Also, their pants are longer than all of the other pants. But it's funny that their "skinny jeans" are way less snug than the "regular fit" at Old Navy or Gap.
4. All of the issues with my kid's pants being too tight were really triggering for when I was a tween/teen and had a hard time squeezing into junior-sized clothes, and feeling like I was really super obese when in reality I just plain wasn't. But for a few minutes I had a heart-attack moment of "Oh no, is my kid getting fat?" and then I basically had to beat the crap out of myself.
Good times, people, good times. But once the 4T fall clothes are washed, the "shift change" is done. :)
1. My kid is no longer super slim, either that or the Old Navy/Gap jeans get slimmer as they size up. When she wore 2T, they were trim but fit well. 3T was more form fitting but still okay. 4T/4 are TIGHT. Like, they actually fit her but they fit like I would have liked my jeans to fit in high school, which is to say they are not very conducive to climbing and squatting and playing. And Punk didn't like them, she complained they were too tight. Bleh. So there are a couple of pairs of jeans (which thankfully were hand-me-downs and I didn't buy them) that I doubt she will be wearing much, if at all.
2. I imagine I will be sending her to preschool in predominantly elastic-waist pants because they are easier for her to take down to go potty. She still struggles with pulling pants UP and no amount of coercing or encouraging seems to help, so I am going to leave that to preschool to teach. Honestly, after all of their crap, they should be teaching her three languages. But anyway, the bonus of the elastic-waist pants is that they fit forever, because they don't get tight. :)
3. Once again, Gymboree wins for the very generous (*cough* too generous) hip/waist sizing (ditto Hanna Anderssen) but thankfully they all have adjustable waist so I can pull them in a ton. Also, their pants are longer than all of the other pants. But it's funny that their "skinny jeans" are way less snug than the "regular fit" at Old Navy or Gap.
4. All of the issues with my kid's pants being too tight were really triggering for when I was a tween/teen and had a hard time squeezing into junior-sized clothes, and feeling like I was really super obese when in reality I just plain wasn't. But for a few minutes I had a heart-attack moment of "Oh no, is my kid getting fat?" and then I basically had to beat the crap out of myself.
Good times, people, good times. But once the 4T fall clothes are washed, the "shift change" is done. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 03:15 pm (UTC)I see a real difference between old navy jeans and gap jeans. Gap are a just little bigger than old navy- children's place runs the smallest in my book. I don't love gymboree. I love love- Oshkosh. They have my all time favorite kids clothes. I have no clue why I went on this rant. They ARE making kids jeans tighter and tighter- it's trendy.
I meant to share that I had a similar oh shit moment- because we got mackenzie some winter boots size 7- and I tried them on yesterday- and they won't zip all the way up. They are nearly knee high and my baby's legs are too chunky. For a second, I also thought- my kid is getting fat- then I was like- WHAT?! Not- she really isn't. The boots are made too narrow. :-)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 03:22 pm (UTC)I'm going to be honest and put my addiction out there and say Gymboree is my favorite, because although it is priced up the wazoo, the clothing LASTS. It's sized bigger so it lasts longer, it washes better, it seems to dodge stains better, it doesn't pill/fray/split at seams. I have put Gymbo clothes on my kid that have been through three kids and you wouldn't know it. I am planning on selling most of my daughter's clothes.
Besides, they're so roomy that when I cinch up the waist a lot, I don't have that "oh crap, my kid is fatter than other kids" feeling. And that is worth it! :)
We don't have many Osh Kosh clothes now (did when she was younger) but I /did/ buy a pair of 4T Osh Kosh jeans and they weren't AS slim as Old Navy/Gap but pretty close. SAD. :(
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 07:17 pm (UTC)I never sell the clothes- although everything is in really fantastic shape- If I have 2 boys I will probably find someone in real need and give all of our clothes to her. It's my way of giving back to the universe.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 01:32 am (UTC)I've noticed that boys' pants are much more fuller cut so I always buy Punk at least 2-3 pairs of boys' pants (cargos or jeans) - usually at thrift stores - that become her hard core play pants. Thank goodness I did that because it means I have SOME things for #2. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 06:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 01:33 am (UTC)kids clothes
Date: 2010-08-24 03:40 pm (UTC)Re: kids clothes
Date: 2010-08-24 05:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 04:06 pm (UTC)Cristin
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 05:13 pm (UTC)Izzy and Zach are a little on the short side and a little below 50th percentile and Gap/Old Navy fit them perfect right now. Although they are both in 3T so we shall see if I feel the same way when they move up a size.
And I agree with how well Gymboree holds up, but their pants don't work nearly as well for my kiddos. And I can't buy Izzy anything with elastic waists because she is too skinny and they fall right off of her. Bleh.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 05:39 pm (UTC)Kids clothes are HARD. I liked when she was a baby and everything just kind of fit. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 07:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 02:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-24 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 01:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 05:49 am (UTC)Fuckin' fat shaming, how does it work? Oh, I could write reams.
*hug* You are Jude sized. I am Siannan sized. Punk is Punk sized, and quite the healthy and beautiful Punk :) We are all what we are.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-27 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 01:28 am (UTC)Jeb is a peanut; he potty trained 2 weeks ago, and is now back in 18 MONTHS shorts since he's got no diaper to hold up the 2T, even though he'll be 3 YEARS old in a few months! Except, 18 month pants look like major high waters. Boo.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 02:34 am (UTC)And I love Gap jeans for exactly that reason - no matter what size they are, they fit skinny kids. For girls there are a LOT more choices if your kids is on the slim side - leggings, dresses, etc. But for boys it's pretty much jeans or pants or sweats once they're in boys sizes. I was thrilled when they started to put those tabs inside jeans to cinch them in - at age 11 J can still wear size 8 shorts because his waist is so small, but for jeans I have to get size 10 slim and cinch them in to fit his waist and still have them long enough. Sweatpants with just elastic are a nightmare - we have to have a drawstring or they're obscene. And for older kid sizes, the jeans do come in different fits, even for boys - boot cut, cargo, painter's pants - whereas in the little kid range it's pretty much the same fit.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-25 12:01 pm (UTC)I know that it is as hard to shop for super skinny kids as it is for bigger kids, but one would think the clothing manufacturers would be on top of that. If they can make different "cuts" for older kids, they can make a couple for the littles, too. They would make money. Otherwise someone would have to size up forever and chop of a million inches on the legs.
Also, diapers are so trim and thin these days that there isn't all that much difference between a diaper and underwear sometimes. When Punk was wearing cloth diapers, it was REALLY hard to find jeans, even baby/toddler jeans.