Small gains at an incredible cost
Feb. 1st, 2003 12:37 pmI realize that the timing is terrible and likely disrespectful, but I'm reminded today of my disgust for the space program. What a money sink. What a waste.
And I'm sorry for the people who lost their lives, and I'm sorry that there was another "first" someone in there (but I wonder, why the first teacher waaaay before the first Israeli?), and I'm sorry that there is likely poisoned debris all over the place, and I'm sorry that people are sad, and I'm sorry that a piece of history was lost. (Or, rather, that several pieces of history were lost - especially seven poignantly vital pieces of history.)
But I can't stand the space program. And that probably makes me a shitty American or something. Oh wait - I already am. It just seems so frivolous and wasteful to toss all kinds of money into these enormous machines and space stations and stuff when the money could be used for Earth - for /our/ people and for /our/ environment and for /our/ livelihoods. It just seems like one gigantic dicksizing competition.
(This is in no way a disrespect to
khaosworks, or anyone else who is really into the space program.)
And I'm sorry for the people who lost their lives, and I'm sorry that there was another "first" someone in there (but I wonder, why the first teacher waaaay before the first Israeli?), and I'm sorry that there is likely poisoned debris all over the place, and I'm sorry that people are sad, and I'm sorry that a piece of history was lost. (Or, rather, that several pieces of history were lost - especially seven poignantly vital pieces of history.)
But I can't stand the space program. And that probably makes me a shitty American or something. Oh wait - I already am. It just seems so frivolous and wasteful to toss all kinds of money into these enormous machines and space stations and stuff when the money could be used for Earth - for /our/ people and for /our/ environment and for /our/ livelihoods. It just seems like one gigantic dicksizing competition.
(This is in no way a disrespect to
no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 09:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 10:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 12:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 03:00 pm (UTC)Bleh. To me, it all seems like more for the upper class. I mean, if we end up "colonizing" space or whatever, who is it going to benefit? Certainly not anyone without a substantial income. I mean, really - they'd either use the place for a rich person's refuge when this planet goes to crap, or they'll use it as a storehouse for undesirables. Whee!
no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 08:31 pm (UTC)It burns hydrogen and oxygen as its main form of propellant and the solid boosters use powdered aluminum and ammonium perchlorate (yes, I had to look that part up). I don't think we are going to run out of those anytime soon.
Re:
Date: 2003-02-01 08:58 pm (UTC)Nowhere to go up, and out.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 10:49 am (UTC)I can't help but be filled with immense curiosity about the universe.. and we don't know until we explore.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 03:01 pm (UTC)If that were the case, I don't think I'd be so irate.
no subject
I respect your right to speak your mind; I also wish I hadn't come across your LJ entry this morning.
I respect your right to speak your mind
Same here, but free speech is what we are all about, Normally I agree with "most" of what jude posts but today I think it was in bad taste. If this was something you believed in and someone posted something like this you would be ALL OVER THEM !!! (read some of your past entries) And that is why I am "Anonymous" for fear of a verbal whipping for speaking my mind and disagreeing with you.
Re: I respect your right to speak your mind
Date: 2003-02-01 02:58 pm (UTC)All over them? A little harsh, perhaps. Sure, I would voice my disagreement, same as you. I would just identify myself, not just by my ISP.
=)
no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 03:02 pm (UTC)But I don't think we're just exploring. If everything were driven solely by curiosity, it'd be a whole different ballgame up there. And there would be more "players."
no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
I grew up on Star Trek and news about NASA's progress on this far-fetched idea of a reusable orbital device. I dreamed. I was a little boy who looked at the stars and imagined what we might be able to accomplish as a species if we stopped pointing guns at each other and started living for some loftier goals.
Just a little bit later, I understood exactly how monumental it was that Russian and American astronauts had met, smiled at each other, and shaken hands hundreds of miles over the Earth in the 1970s. And these were still MILITARY officers at that point! And this in the height of the Cold War!
The key point of the International Space Station for me is the notion that we are working together. This is not a platform for superiority, but for progress. It also gives us a global, common language with which we can discuss cooperation. The space program is not, in my opinion, a waste of funding. Quite the contrary, its very existence is the last great hope we have to work together for lofty, common goals, to begin shaping a world in which we live not as Americans and Iraqis and North Koreans, but as humans.
Thank you for your post, for in the aftermath of this, in my callousness and shock, I had forgotten to think about these things. You've helped me rearticulate concepts that I haven't thought about in a very long time.
What I think you and I would agree on very much is that we, as a race, MUST CHANGE THINGS HERE ON EARTH! We must work (and even fight, perhaps) for the preservation of our fellow human beings, for the advancement of our species, for our progress and growth and development, a development that affirms the contributions of ALL its members.
What we seem to disagree on is the role the space program could play in that. I hope you might agree with me that the program gives hope to many of us that we CAN continue to grow and progress in compassion and love.
That's why this is so devastating. Just for a moment, it suggests to those of us who, like me, see this program as a very symbol for such goals that our attempts to reach them have been futile.
May they not be futile. May we continue to dream. May we continue to look at the stars. May we continue to serve our fellow human beings in love.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 06:44 pm (UTC)If you *really* want to talk about a dicksizing competition, you should be criticizing the Dept of Defense and the military-industrial complex. Dubya wants $500+ billion in the next budget for defense. The space program is peanuts compared to that.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-01 07:41 pm (UTC)If the money wasn't going to the space program (which, dick waving though it may be, is something which can be at least classed as a scientific and thus potentially benificial to humankind program) then it would be going to weapons development programs.
If not to weapons, then to "infrastructure development programs" which rarely means cheap housing for those that need it... and is more directly aimed at providing better roads for your local politician to drive to work better or more money towards clearing out the homeless so they can use the land to build more homeless. I've not yet seen a US governement willing to put the needs of the homeless or disadvantaged in front of the needs of the voters and those who pay for the campaigns.
I'm thrilled that the space program is still running. Wasteful as the current management may be, it's a step in a direction which is both politically sound as it gains more votes, and scientifically sound as it can potentially benefit the human race. The benefit may be long reaching but at least it's there.
I could go on for pages about how inificient the current program in but that would be pointless, but at least its a step in a humanitarian direction (even if it doesn't often seem that way). If you believe that your present government gives a square green shit about the current terrestrial issues otherwise then i'd suggest you're possibly living in a spaced out world already.
Having said all that, i'm getting very sick of the "heroes" hype that's going on at the moment. They were people up there doing a job and they had an accident, which is no more heroic than when a dildo factory explodes and kills seven.
Hahaha!
Re: Hahaha!
Date: 2003-02-01 09:21 pm (UTC)partly agree, partly disagree
Date: 2003-02-01 11:06 pm (UTC)Too much money is indeed spent on the space program, compared to the needs on earth. Yes, there have been scientific benefits, but I think a billion dollars in NSF grants or education funding accomplishes more than a billion dollars sent to N(eed) A(nother) S(even) A(stronauts). [I did not make up that joke, BTW, it dates back to the Challenger event.]
Partly disagree
I really like to watch, read, etc., about space flight. I think it can serve worthwhile goals. I certainly don't find the space program "disgusting." Less money should be spent for it, and the focus should be on scientific accomplishments rather than the "wow factor." If that means giving up cool things like manned Mars exploration for the foreseeable future, I'm disappointed not to get to see them, but so be it.
It was a competition in the Cold War era, but I don't think that's what it's about any more. Russia is clearly a second-rate space power these days, and Europe and Japan are gradually catching up. No one is competing against the U.S. for "biggest space dick" these days; indeed, nations celebrate when their astronauts get to ride on the shuttle.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-02 11:52 am (UTC)There's valuable perspective gained from looking at home from very far away. Travel enriches.
As far as the science goes, the latest shuttle missions were studying an astoundingly efficient form of combustionone that, as soon as it is possible to duplicate here in the gravity well, will vastly decrease our dependency on combustible fuels and decrease by vast amounts pollutants and waste heat.
Also, recent advances have shown that the dangerous chemicals in solid rocket boosters can be replaced with simple paraffin. You know. Candle-wax. Which could lead towards safer fuels in all of out combustible fuel technologies.
Neither of these potential advances have anything to do with military applications.
I certainly respect your opinion that the space program appears to be expensive and wastefulbut when I consider how much money is wasted on professional sports and the music and entertainment industry, I just have to shrug. We could easily trade the next Superbowl for a safer, redesigned (or perhaps just newer) reusable spacecraft. It's a matter of priorities, and I've always been on the side of advancing human understanding versus bread and circuses.
And that's without even mentioning expensive and wasteful and not-exactly-surgical military ventures of questionable ethics and questionable benefit to the average man.
*sigh*
[*]
no subject
Date: 2003-02-03 07:20 am (UTC)Yes, we spend a lot of money on the entertainment and sports industry. I wish we were a better people.