I've doing a lot of thinking about houses. Basically, the big question is, do I want to own one?
The big trend in my life has been to favor apartment living because I am, by nature, a rather transient individual. In my life I've had the opportunity to pack and move with reckless abandon, and I've been privileged to live in a number of cool places (NM, GA, MA, OH) and some not-so-cool ones (ME). I've also been pretty free with relationships as well - when I was in them, there was always an "out" on the horizon, always the need for a safety net in case something didn't work out. Even when I was married, the relationship wasn't stable. I didn't want to make large purchases with him, nor did I want to establish roots. We had a semi-open relationship because I wasn't willing to give certain things up. (Of course, those "things" involved sleeping with women, but still...)
It's hard to deny the practical applications of homeownership, though - from tax deductions to just the wisdom of paying money to something you own rather than something someone else owns. And it would eliminate the idiocy that is "pet rent." And I could paint the walls any old way my little heart desired! These are all exciting things. So for the last month or so, I've been tossing around the idea of houses. It started as I was watching
356dreamer set up his new house - choosing colors and schemes and things. It seemed like fun!
Last night when I was on the phone with my
smurfbrother, it just made me crazy about houses all over again. Jennifer and I have been talking futureward about houses and moving and all of that, but now I want a house now! Last night I was like, "I think when my lease runs out, I want to try to see if I can get a house." But then we got into a discussion about it...
She says that she wouldn't feel comfortable moving into a house if it was my house, not ours. So if I bought a house and we weren't living together, she wouldn't want to live with me, because it would be my house. But my lease runs out in July, and hers in October, and that's soon (to me) to be thinking about something so serious as not just living together, but purchasing a home together. I've always felt that since I never want to get married again (and since I can't, legally), house-buying would be my symbol to people that this was a serious commitment, a commitment on paper, a commitment with something to show for it. And while what we have is special and wonderful and seems, right now, to be the kind of thing I want to carry into the distant future, I worry that 2003 is too soon.
So now I'm in this dilemma... do I continue to think about the possibility of buying a place of my own? Do I rent for another year and see where this goes? Do I throw caution to the wind and make things work - if I want them to, why not start now? I was telling her last night that there's little more humbling than profession a life and a commitment with someone in front of hundreds of people, some of whom that are close to you and some that are family acquaintances, and then having to retract that statement, over and over and over, every time you see one of them. Whenever I visit my hometown, it seems like a rehash of my stupid decision in 1999. I sure don't want to do that again.
Sometimes I hate being a Libra. At least I have months and months to process this to death.
The big trend in my life has been to favor apartment living because I am, by nature, a rather transient individual. In my life I've had the opportunity to pack and move with reckless abandon, and I've been privileged to live in a number of cool places (NM, GA, MA, OH) and some not-so-cool ones (ME). I've also been pretty free with relationships as well - when I was in them, there was always an "out" on the horizon, always the need for a safety net in case something didn't work out. Even when I was married, the relationship wasn't stable. I didn't want to make large purchases with him, nor did I want to establish roots. We had a semi-open relationship because I wasn't willing to give certain things up. (Of course, those "things" involved sleeping with women, but still...)
It's hard to deny the practical applications of homeownership, though - from tax deductions to just the wisdom of paying money to something you own rather than something someone else owns. And it would eliminate the idiocy that is "pet rent." And I could paint the walls any old way my little heart desired! These are all exciting things. So for the last month or so, I've been tossing around the idea of houses. It started as I was watching
Last night when I was on the phone with my
She says that she wouldn't feel comfortable moving into a house if it was my house, not ours. So if I bought a house and we weren't living together, she wouldn't want to live with me, because it would be my house. But my lease runs out in July, and hers in October, and that's soon (to me) to be thinking about something so serious as not just living together, but purchasing a home together. I've always felt that since I never want to get married again (and since I can't, legally), house-buying would be my symbol to people that this was a serious commitment, a commitment on paper, a commitment with something to show for it. And while what we have is special and wonderful and seems, right now, to be the kind of thing I want to carry into the distant future, I worry that 2003 is too soon.
So now I'm in this dilemma... do I continue to think about the possibility of buying a place of my own? Do I rent for another year and see where this goes? Do I throw caution to the wind and make things work - if I want them to, why not start now? I was telling her last night that there's little more humbling than profession a life and a commitment with someone in front of hundreds of people, some of whom that are close to you and some that are family acquaintances, and then having to retract that statement, over and over and over, every time you see one of them. Whenever I visit my hometown, it seems like a rehash of my stupid decision in 1999. I sure don't want to do that again.
Sometimes I hate being a Libra. At least I have months and months to process this to death.
Re: Doh! Scandal!
Date: 2003-02-10 11:02 am (UTC)Must be a theme.
Re: Doh! Scandal!
Date: 2003-02-10 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:06 am (UTC)I'd have to see if I could even afford to buy a house by myself on my salary. Maybe I should look into that before I work myself into a tizzy.
That's a very logical suggestion. But I wonder if she would feel like it still wasn't "hers" because we didn't move into it together. I suppose I'd have to ask.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:30 am (UTC)You could buy a condo so it technically is yours, but move in together so it feels like both of yours.
The interest in a house is tax deductible, but think of it this way... you pay in $1000/mo in interest (pretend). You get back like 15%-28% of it (depending on your tax bracket). But if you could've taken that $1000 and put it in a savings account, you'd still have that $1000 and not have spent $700 of it in "lost money" (interest). It's easier to save money for a house by renting in something cheaper, I think. We did a lot better by living in a (relatively) cheap apartment for awhile and saving a bunch of money to put as a down payment on a house. If you put down 20%, you get out of paying PMI (which can be $50-$100/mo which is NOT tax deductible).
Just some food for thought.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:40 pm (UTC)But I certainly am filing your information away, since you've already done it. Perhaps renting together is a smarter thing on all accounts... it's just that it's so hard to find a place that will rent to multiple pets. Ugh.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-11 10:09 am (UTC)And if you've ever met my monsters, you know that they're so friendly that they would bumrush the landlord, and then I'd be screwed.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-11 11:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-11 02:18 pm (UTC)They never asked, though. (I was only supposed to have one.)
no subject
Date: 2003-02-16 11:38 am (UTC)Minus the money she would have to pay in rent, of course. And if buys something around $100K, as you suggested in the first paragraph, interest will be much closer to $500/mo, not $1000. And she can still put 28% of that money into savings, and do it immediatly by increasing the number of exemptions on her employer's W4, giving her more money in her pocket every paycheck. Interest isn't "lost money," it's a necessity when it comes to buying a home... unless one is an heiress to a rubber tree planation or just co-wrote the latest Britney Spears top 40 single. PMI truly sucks. But what's the alternative? Saving $20,000 isn't exactly easy in this economy, and mortgage rates are almost certain to go up over the next five years, not down, easily adding the $50 or $100 back to her monthly payment, negating any savings incurred by avoiding PMI.
No doubt about, it's better to buy a home in a down economy than in a strong one. Buy a home now, and plan on starting an aggressive investment strategy within 3 years. Just my 2 cents.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-16 02:06 pm (UTC)I think only $100-$150 of our payment goes towards the principal each month. We put down about $37k on our house, most of it saved by living extremely frugally and in a relatively cheap apartment... in the down economy and with me losing my job. We've been having a lot more trouble saving now that we have the house. Granted, Jude neither has 2 incomes nor makes anywhere near what Bill does, but houses are money sucks, just because you look around and say "I want to do this, or that" to the house, you need things you didn't need in an apartment, or something breaks that you have to pay to fix.
Unless you plan on living there a long time OR you are buying into a place that's going to increase in value significantly... even with the low interest rates, it's good to wait. When the interest rates go up, the prices of housing will go down (or no one will be able to sell their properties. Why do you think the home values have skyrocketed recently?).
Bill's old house, he lived in 3 years and had a roommate paying him rent. After paying for the new siding (carpenter ants), new carpet (cat/rabbit damage), new furnace (I think it was the furnace... it was $2500 at any rate), new deck (the old one was rotted away), AND selling it FSBO... in Dublin where the property values were skyrocketing... he came away even... selling it for his purchase price plus the $ he put into improvements. Doesn't include any of the payments he made every month, that was like "rent".
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 01:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-11 01:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-11 02:24 pm (UTC)p.s. That sucks about the whole war thing.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:12 am (UTC)Or, alternatively, can you and Jen see if after your year of renting, you can get tenant-at-will renewals? Then you could not worry about your leases being out of sync, and you could move whenever you wanted to.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:42 pm (UTC)And this probably sounds totally snotty and whiny, but I hate condos. So even though it might be a smart thing, I just don't want to live in one. They're like living in a big icky apartment complex. Yucko!
I guess I have a lot to think about.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-11 06:57 am (UTC)In general, though, I agree with you about condos - it's one of the reasons we didn't buy before getting the house. With what the market in Boston did for those years, it was a sad mistake.
Obviously, there's lots to think about and consider. I'm sure you and Jen can work something out that you'll both be happy with, and that lets you do what you want =)
no subject
Date: 2003-02-12 06:45 am (UTC)I'm sure you and Jen can work something out that you'll both be happy with, and that lets you do what you want =)
I'll probably stick it out in the rental market through my tenure in Columbus, and maybe a cute girl can be convinced to rent with me... test the waters or something. And then, if/when we move out of state together... :)
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:20 am (UTC)I'd love a house. But with my career field being so unstable right now, I don't think it'd be a good idea.
And you hate being a Libra? How about being a Virgo-Libra cusp...I'm indecisive and I'm nitpicky.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 04:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:44 pm (UTC)It may be a smart idea, but I just don't like them. Like guacamole. I've never tried it, but I've convinced myself that I hate it.
I'm difficult like that.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:51 am (UTC)Just my opinion. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Are ye nuts??!?
Buy a house! Even if you don't live in it! OWN PROPERTY!!
I'm not talking about being a consuming capitalist imperialist pig scum. I'm talking about using your money wisely.
I'm one of those who doesn't like ostentation either, but my wife (who is quite justified to say so, and whom I would NOT characterize as "greedy") is fond of pointint out to me that "the more you have, the more people you can help."
I like that attitude.
Anyway, when you rent, you're just throwing your money away in support of a landowner who's making a fortune off of you. When you own, your value is increasing (most of the time) even if you sit there and do nothing. Last year we made--in property increase--a value almost equal to my annual salary! (No, I didn't expect it to go that much.) Now, granted, we'll never realize most of that amount until we divest of the property, but the money's there on paper at least.
Also, if you like America, well, enjoy it. And if you DON'T like the system, heck, TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT AND SQUEEZE IT DRY!!! ;)
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:46 pm (UTC)I have a lot to think about.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 08:28 am (UTC)Do you two want to live togethor first for a bit? Again: home buying is a big step for anyone, bigger for a couple.
Big decision, but as you say, there's time to obsess over it :)
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 07:48 pm (UTC)I'm really just babbling with my fingers most of the time here. Yes, I think we should live together first before purchasing a house together. But yes, it will be hard to rent with three animals.
Argh. Reality.
no subject
teh kitie lofe wil adotp all kities from yuo!!`1
no subject
Date: 2003-02-11 06:42 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-02-11 03:41 am (UTC)I forget who the realtor is in this thread, but just to sit down with her and to see what you can afford is a very good place to start. You can then start looking with that price range in mind. It does not hurt to look at all.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-11 10:10 am (UTC)I hate landlords who don't allow lots of pets. I mean, 2 cats is just like 1 cat! :)
no subject
Date: 2003-02-10 12:52 pm (UTC)no subject
house buying
Date: 2003-02-10 08:43 pm (UTC)For instance, as much as a like my apartment, suppose at some point I get a job on the far east side or far west side of town. Once my lease is out, I would then want to move over to that area so as to have a short trip to work. As I learned by hauling out to Marysville and back several times a week, I HATE long commutes.
When you buy a house, you're stuck. However far away you work, you get stuck driving that far every day. Also, when I think of the areas I often find myself hanging out--OSU campus area, Clintonville, Short North/VV, etc.--either I wouldn't want to own in those areas, or probably couldn't afford to.
I'd have to be making a lot more $ than I am now, and have a job I expect to be at for a damn long time.
Re: house buying
Date: 2003-02-12 06:44 am (UTC)But no, I don't expect to be at this job forever, and I don't even play to be in this STATE past two more years, so it's probably a foolish idea, especially since it caused some minor drama on the relationship front. WHEE! :)