Car Seat Question - Seatbelt vs. LATCH
Jun. 20th, 2007 09:52 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So I decided to get my car seat professionally installed by a cute fireman. Hey, why not, right?
Anyway, I have the Graco SnugRide with EPS Foam or whatever, and the base is usable with seatbelts or LATCH. The LATCH system for my car (Neo the 2007 Toyota Matrix) has LATCH anchors properly spaced for the two outside rear seats (behind the driver and behind the passenger), but the anchors are improperly spaced for the rear center.
Cute Fireman and I had a discussion about which is better - using the LATCH system and installing the seat on one of the sides (thereby increasing risk in a side-impact collision), or using the seatbelt and installing the seat in the center. CF said that the seatbelt should not be any less safe than the LATCH system because the seatbelt has that funky locking mechanism. But I'll be honest, I've watched that sappy YouTube video about that kid in the booster seat too many times. (You know, once is too many.)
So... what do you think? Is LATCH safer than the seatbelt? Right now, CF has the car seat in the center with the seatbelt pulled and locked tightly, and it really does feel nice and snug and tight. And I do feel better having the seat in the middle for crash purposes. But I'm interested in your opinions.
Do you choose "LATCH on the side" or "Seatbelt in the center"?
[Poll #1006608]
Thanks!
Anyway, I have the Graco SnugRide with EPS Foam or whatever, and the base is usable with seatbelts or LATCH. The LATCH system for my car (Neo the 2007 Toyota Matrix) has LATCH anchors properly spaced for the two outside rear seats (behind the driver and behind the passenger), but the anchors are improperly spaced for the rear center.
Cute Fireman and I had a discussion about which is better - using the LATCH system and installing the seat on one of the sides (thereby increasing risk in a side-impact collision), or using the seatbelt and installing the seat in the center. CF said that the seatbelt should not be any less safe than the LATCH system because the seatbelt has that funky locking mechanism. But I'll be honest, I've watched that sappy YouTube video about that kid in the booster seat too many times. (You know, once is too many.)
So... what do you think? Is LATCH safer than the seatbelt? Right now, CF has the car seat in the center with the seatbelt pulled and locked tightly, and it really does feel nice and snug and tight. And I do feel better having the seat in the middle for crash purposes. But I'm interested in your opinions.
Do you choose "LATCH on the side" or "Seatbelt in the center"?
[Poll #1006608]
Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:08 pm (UTC)She's also got some links to seat safety sites that may be helpful.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:39 pm (UTC)With other people's kids that I've transported, I've always used the seatbelts in my car(s) and have never had a problem. But yeah.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:31 pm (UTC)my guess would be middle, with seatbelt.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:40 pm (UTC)From what I understand, latch and seatbelt are pretty equivalent - it's just nice to have the option, since in one car one might work better than the other, so good to have choices. But seatbelts are perfectly good and safe, so don't worry about that!
I know, it's scary, trying to sort through everything and make the right decisions... but I think you've already got it, and yay for you for having it professionally installed! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 02:56 pm (UTC)That said, the VW standard seatbelt tensioning system did a perfectly fine job of keeping Widget and her booster seat (and me) from going ANYWHERE when we rear-ended the stopped car at 45mph.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 06:34 pm (UTC)But I'm glad to hear that the seatbelt worked on the Widget. Because she's a big kid and that was a scary crash! Success story!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 03:12 pm (UTC)Also, if it's safe enough to keep a PERSON from being killed in a wreck, it's going to hold your 30 pound sweet pea/carseat combination.
That's what it's made for. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 03:19 pm (UTC)i think from a safety standpoint, the middle is the safest- and, if you're going to be doing some of the "lean over the carseat and breastfeed for the amusement of truckers everywhere", you can sit on either side if the carseat is in the middle.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 04:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 04:03 pm (UTC)My vehicle’ owner’s manual states that the middle of the back seat is the safest position to secure your child. The middle seat in my vehicle does not have LATCH. Which position should I use?
The clekâ„¢ booster seat can be used with or without the LATCH function. Children are always safest riding in the back seat. The best placement of a child restraint is where it fits securely whether that is in the left, right, or center position. This position MUST have:
* A shoulder belt – positions with only a lap belt are NOT safe to use
* The tops of the child’s ears MUST be below the top of the vehicle seat back or a fully deployed head restraint on the vehicle seat. If this condition is not met, a booster seat with an integrated head restraint MUST be used.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 05:15 pm (UTC)Since the cute fireman got it in the center snugly, I'd leave it there.
And as for the sappy Kyle video, they leave out the part where most LATCH sytems top out at 40lbs and can't be used beyond that anyways...so their message is really really skewed on that thing. Good intentions, bad info.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 06:28 pm (UTC)I tend to agree that cutie fireman did a good job and I'm inclined to leave it right there. Thanks for chiming in!
And thanks for the info on LATCH topping out at 40lbs. I didn't know that AT ALL... and that's damned good info.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 05:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 06:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 06:14 pm (UTC)Our center seat doesn't have a shoulder belt, but nothing in our car seat manual or vehicle owner's manual suggested that the absence of a shoulder belt made the center seat any more or less safe.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 06:26 pm (UTC)xoxo
no subject
Date: 2007-06-20 11:51 pm (UTC)The middle does offer a small safety benefit. Yes, I said small. As in, not large. There actually are benefits to being on the side in a frontal crash (less over rotation), and a rollover (less collapse of the structure). Then there are also benefits to being on the side in a SIDE impact... if it's on the other side!
The middle offers no safety benefit for frontal or rollover crashes, and marginal for side. A RF car seat is incredibly safe in any impact, especially a side impact (where RF makes a bigger difference than in a frontal impact, surpisingly). Adding EPS foam makes it even safer. However, the middle is the furthest from any point of impact.
Moving forward, the LATCh/seatbelt dilemma (and yes, I purposely dropped the h to lower case, since it technically is... although it bugs me). You're not actually using LATCh with an infant seat, because you're not using the top tether. You're using lower anchors only, which I am at times fond of and at times bothered by... it depends on my mood. So, lower anchors. I hate hate HATE installing SnugRide bases with seatbelts. Not only because it's a bitch for me, but because I know that 9 times out of ten the parents will royally fuck it up when they try. So... I would tend to lean towards the anchors in this case. UNLESS you have locking latchplates versus retractors, in which case a seatbelt install is golden. I hate locking retractors for RF seats, they're a pain in the ass. I'm betting that's probably what you have, though. In which case... unless that tech used a locking clip, you're going to start seeing major tippage, which will drive you batty and make you uninstall the seat. In that case... I'd use the anchors on the side. I really would. I think you'll get a better install ON YOUR OWN. A tech should not do it for you, s/he should show you how to do it yourself. Because eventually you WILL need to do it yourself, and you'll be completely lost if no one showed you how.
LATCh has a minimal (as in not statistically significant) safety advantage in that a) it was designed FOR carseats, it's not something that already existed that was tweaked to be acceptable with carseats, and b) it's possible to get a tighter install, and more probable that the average parent will achieve an acceptable install. However, LATCh also offers two points of (extremely unlikely) failure, versus one with a seatbelt. And ignore everything that YouTube video made you think... you can find dozens of rebuttals if you look. I sincerely doubt that anything was wrong with that seatbelt, and if I had to place money on it, I would bet that the blame lies solely with the parents. However, I'm not here to comment on that. The truth is that unless you drive a Chrysler vehicle with generation 3 seatbelts, seatbelt failure is extremely unlikely, and lower anchor failure is similarly rare.
My son is in a FF Britax Boulevard installed in the center of a Subaru Forester with a three point belt and top tether. He is also in a rearfacing Boulevard installed with the lower anchors and top tethered on the passenger side in the van. He's FF versus RF in my car for the summer only (though he will likely be 33 pounds by the end of summer anyway) for health reasons. We use my car sparingly for this reason.
The best thing you can do is securely install the seat, safely secure the child, and keep him/her rear facing as long as possible, followed by harnessed with top tether as long as possible. Middle versus side and LATCh versus seatbelt really have no clear winner. Whichever is easiest and most secure is the safest.
How's that for a novel?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 03:34 pm (UTC)You raise a good point that the infant seat isn't totally LATCHed in because you can't use the top tether. I hadn't really thought of it that way... I just know that it doesn't FEEL looser than when I had pulled the LATCH belt as tight as I could. It feels the same. I will keep a close eye on it, though, about the tipping and slippage.
Thank you for stopping by! :)
no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 12:42 am (UTC)from a paramedic stand point that sees wrecks with car seats on a regular basis, I'd have to vote center with belt. One thing I would recommend is that you don't get the car seat with a break away base. I know they have made improvements but those things still make me nervous. Another thing to keep in mind while using a rear facing car seat is always drape a light blanket over the car seat and baby to prevent glass from flying at baby.
From a mommy stand point, the littlest one is always in the center. Not that I don't like the big kids it's just safest in the middle.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 03:27 pm (UTC)Thanks for the information re: actual crashes. It's helpful. And also about the blanket - I wouldn't have thought of that.
Thank you!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 03:28 pm (UTC)And yeah, I love the Matrix. It's a pretty sweet car.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 03:32 pm (UTC)I guess I'll have to just really examine it before I use it and make sure it meets my standards. It actually feels just as tight or slightly tighter than I was able to get with the LATCH stuff, so for right now I think it's set.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 02:52 pm (UTC)With the latch, it was SO tight. That made our decision for us. Had the seatbelt been tight, however, we probably would have stayed with the middle.
BTW - We put the seat on the passenger side so that the driver could reach back easier.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-21 03:29 pm (UTC)I'm going to keep the seatbelt install for right now because it IS super tight. But the minute it starts slipping or something, I think I'll make the move.
Thanks.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-24 04:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-29 09:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-07-01 04:16 am (UTC)Now I have to hope my baby won't be born this weekend so I can go to the police department Monday and get them to check it out. *grumble*