![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
judecorp"It's a new frontier," they say.
"It's wide open, anything can happen!"
But you've got a lot of nerve to call yourself a pioneer
when you're too goddamned conservative to take real chances.
In honor of this little witticism I leave you with a teeny tiny political commentary: I love how both sides say they won the debate.
"It's wide open, anything can happen!"
But you've got a lot of nerve to call yourself a pioneer
when you're too goddamned conservative to take real chances.
In honor of this little witticism I leave you with a teeny tiny political commentary: I love how both sides say they won the debate.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
MIT wins Harvard-Yale game!
Date: 2004-10-09 01:23 pm (UTC)Re: MIT wins Harvard-Yale game!
Date: 2004-10-09 01:26 pm (UTC)Helloooo, apathy!
Re: MIT wins Harvard-Yale game!
Date: 2004-10-09 01:32 pm (UTC)Re: MIT wins Harvard-Yale game!
Date: 2004-10-09 01:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 02:10 pm (UTC)Bush definitely won Most Improved, and they both get the Showed Up award. I don't know (or care) who won because I decided who I was voting for (or, more accurately, not voting for) the day we invaded Iraq.
re: who won
Date: 2004-10-09 05:54 pm (UTC)And "win" here is a doubly-defined term. In a general debatey sense, the guy who wins was the one who got his point across better, the one who tore holes in the other guy's arguments better, the guy who was more gracious when he was doing well and more forthright when he wasn't.
In the political sense, the winner of the debate is the one who actually swings the direction of the vote (in his direction). I have generally seen Kerry in the lead in the first kind of winning (though not nearly enough of one to "win") and no evidence that the debates have had any effect on the candidate each individual is planning to vote for.
Re: who won
Date: 2004-10-09 06:19 pm (UTC)www.pollingreport.com
OMG!
Date: 2004-10-09 08:36 pm (UTC)Re: OMG!
Date: 2004-10-09 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 09:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 08:33 pm (UTC)-_-
no subject
Date: 2004-10-09 09:53 pm (UTC)