Too scared to ever go back...
Oct. 18th, 2004 05:39 pmAs much as the affordability and the good friends draw me back to Columbus, it's things like THIS ARTICLE that really scare me into even considering it. There's so much at stake in my life, so much Jennifer and I want to accomplish, and I just can't run the risk of having anything screw that up.
It just makes my heart hurt to think about it.
On Nov. 2, Ohio will vote on Issue 1, a state constitutional amendment that purports to simply ban same-sex marriage but actually goes much further. Ten other states -- Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon and Utah -- are also voting on anti-gay marriage amendments. They're all expected to pass, most by wide margins. Eight of the state amendments prohibit domestic partnerships or any other public benefits or recognition for gay couples. But as a headline on the front page of Columbus Dispatch recently said, "Issue 1 wording makes it the strictest." Polls show support for it hovering above 60 percent.
Issue 1 is only two sentences long, but there's a world of uncertainty in it. While the first sentence simply decrees that marriage is between a man and a woman, the second says, "This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage."
It just makes my heart hurt to think about it.
On Nov. 2, Ohio will vote on Issue 1, a state constitutional amendment that purports to simply ban same-sex marriage but actually goes much further. Ten other states -- Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon and Utah -- are also voting on anti-gay marriage amendments. They're all expected to pass, most by wide margins. Eight of the state amendments prohibit domestic partnerships or any other public benefits or recognition for gay couples. But as a headline on the front page of Columbus Dispatch recently said, "Issue 1 wording makes it the strictest." Polls show support for it hovering above 60 percent.
Issue 1 is only two sentences long, but there's a world of uncertainty in it. While the first sentence simply decrees that marriage is between a man and a woman, the second says, "This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage."
no subject
Date: 2004-10-18 09:58 pm (UTC)it is terribly sad. But know that many ministers, myself included, will still perform the cerimony for people who love eachother.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-18 10:04 pm (UTC)I don't want to be a spoiled brat about the whole thing, but it's not the commitment I'm looking for - I already have that. When it comes to the spiritual side of marriage, Jen and I are already married. In our hearts and heads, we've been married for some time now, and that commitment is strong.
What I want is legal recognition, legal rights, and legal benefits. And not for me so much as for our children. It's too risky for me to bring children up in a place where co-parents' rights are not established and protected under the law, where health insurance is not available, where the majority of the people in the state are vehemently opposed to our family. That just makes me sad.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-18 10:13 pm (UTC)Beyond voting and spreading the word, I don't know what else to DO about it.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-18 10:16 pm (UTC)You are ensuring that your light is not kept under a bushel barrel, and that is important.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-18 10:07 pm (UTC)I understand the approach for those who simply want the term reserved for man-woman relations (while still disagreeing with them), but this is the sort of nasty slip-ins that are found throughout lawmaking, of course.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-18 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-18 10:17 pm (UTC)I was like "what do you mean?" and she proceeded to tell me that her pastor told her that gays wanted to teach gayness in schools and good Christians needed to stop them. Needless to say, my head hurt for the rest of the day.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 01:55 am (UTC)I will be thrilled if it doesn't pass (and will go back to considering relocating for Jen to go to school), but just the fact that something so heinous can come up for vote scares the poop out of me.
p.s. Have that baby already, will ya?!??!?!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 01:59 am (UTC)And believe me, this baby has been cookign WAY too long.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 02:07 am (UTC)Get off the computer and go have more sex!
no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 02:36 pm (UTC)On my way to the car in Lima (big city for Allen County) I got yelled at. I have a Kerry rainbow bumper sticker. I was told to "burn in hell you liberal faggot" To which I replied "liberal dyke you moron." And really, I'm much more active as a babykiller. Sigh.
So yeah, sign me up for that brain drain because my four degrees and I will only be home for Christmas after this year.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-24 09:39 pm (UTC)Come be our roommate!!