judecorp: (g'nap!)
So the HR lady realized that they had made a mistake with the $89 for Jen's insurance and dropped it down to $40something (the difference between the $125 family plan and the $80something employee plus child plan) post-tax. And she made sure I knew about the Queer Tax, which I did. (By the way, the Queer Tax in this case amounts to an extra $117 per paycheck that is added to my taxable income, because that's how much my job pays to insure a dirty, dirty queer.)

The HR lady made a point to let me know that this whole "having to put the same-sex spouse post-tax" was such a pain and made things so /difficult/ and "blah blah, if the rest of the country, blah blah, the IRS says we have to..." and after rolling my eyes over the phone about 60 times I finally managed to say, "Yeah, you should see my taxes." I'm really sorry my unfair tax penalty is difficult for YOU. ;)

But in the continuing saga of the health insurance, today our prescription cards came. With my name and Punk's name on them. ARGH!

I guess I'll be calling HR /again/!! Annoying.
judecorp: (i hate it)
I am so effing pissed right now. It's a good thing it's Saturday because I could seriously strangle an HR person right now. (No offense to anyone working in HR.)

When we got all of the benefits information for my new job, we decided to compare the health plans with Jen's job. We thought we hit the jackpot! The coverage was good - REALLY good (one of the perks of working in the hospital system, I guess). And about $60/paycheck cheaper than Jen's. So of course I filled out all of the forms to sign us up, turned them in, and got a note so we could cancel Jen's insurance. Great? Not.

The new coverage starts June 1st, which is umm, Monday. I get a notice in the mail TODAY "verifying" my payroll deductions for benefits.

Instead of the "Employee + Family" health plan for $125 pre-tax/paycheck and the "Employee + Family" eye insurance plan for $16 pre-tax/paycheck, I am signed up for:

1. "Employee + Child" health plan for $81 pre-tax/paycheck PLUS "Non-Qualifying Dependent" health plan for $89 post-tax/paycheck
2. "Employee + Child" eye plan for $11 pre-tax/paycheck PLUS "Non-Qualifying Dependent" eye plan for $9 post-tax/paycheck

I am furious. FURIOUS. On so many levels.

1. Is this NOT something they could have mentioned ON THE SIGN UP FORMS?
2. Is this NOT something they could have mentioned IN THE BENEFITS PRESENTATION?
3. Is this NOT something they could have mentioned WHEN I TURNED MY FORMS IN?
4. The notice I received TODAY (05-30) which is dated 05-26 says that if I need to make changes, I can do them BEFORE 05-25.

EFF YOU to the benefits department for this oversight, and EFF YOU for sending something dated AFTER the "change date" and the biggest EFF YOU OF ALL to the effing Defense of Marriage Act for screwing my LEGALLY MARRIED family out of all of this money! That is *(&#(*^$ highway robbery and it is NOT right and it is NOT Constitutional and honestly? I am so angry right now that I can see why some people say they won't be friends with anyone who votes against marriage equality.
judecorp: (erase hate)
Heck yeah, kids. Three down, forty-seven to go.

Woo and hoo, as Corey Jo would say.

Merger

Jun. 19th, 2008 10:24 pm
judecorp: (work poison)
So my agency, the one I just started working for, just merged with another, bigger agency. Well, technically it hasn't happened yet (July 1), but it's a done deal. Today I had to sit through 2.5 hours of merge/benefits information and fill out all of the same new hire forms I filled out a month ago. Good times, good times.

I was hired under the auspices of getting 15 days PTO this year. That's not so great, considering I was pretty spoiled at my last gig with the four weeks of vacation time, a ridiculous amount of sick time, and something obscene like 13 holidays. So going down to 15 days and 12 holidays was a cut, but hey, doable.

The new agency gives first year employees - wait for it - 10 days of total PTO. And 8 holidays. 10 days of paid time off, whether it is sick or vacation. I have a child. Who gets sick sometimes. And who attends a child care that takes 15 paid holidays. So right there? That's 7 out of 10 days of PTO if I covered all of her holidays. Well, 6 - since one of those days is the day after Thanksgiving and I don't work Fridays. But wait, maybe I do. Because the new place? Wants all salaried employees to work 40 hours. I work 36 (four 9s). So I went into this meeting more than a little surly, which is scaring my Director because she is worried I will leave. And if I leave they are kind of screwed. And honestly? I am considering jobsearching again, even though I don't want to.

The kicker was when they were going over the benefits stuff. I was already surly so it didn't take much. It was a no-brainer to decline the health insurance because even though it is somewhat better coverage, it's something like $135 more per month than what we have now. But I was considering the dental because our dental sucks. And the HR lady read me the spiel about how any benefits I get for Jen count as taxable income blah blah blah because of the stupid Feds and how Jen's portion can't be pre-tax blah blah and I nod and whatever because I already know the suckitude. But then she says that I have to sign this thing that states that I know all of this and she starts to hand it over and I notice that it's a form that was originally written to address domestic partnerships, and is in fact still in use for domestic partnerships of any gender make-up. So one of the things you have to "attest to," on the DP form, is that neither party is married.

I told them I wouldn't sign the form. Because we are married. And she tried to be all nice about it and be like, "I know, but to the Federal government blah blah blah," and I said, "Of course. But I am legally married regardless and I do not feel right about signing a legal form attesting to the fact that I am not married." And she offered to write in something like, 'according to the Federal government,' and at that point I decided that the increased dental benefits weren't really worth signing a shitty form. Because having to file taxes two different ways is ridiculous enough.

I wonder if this has ever come up before. It sure didn't seem like it had. Surprising, for a rather large social service agency.
judecorp: (erase hate)
tell me about your most recent interaction with homophobia and how you dealt with it.

and then give yourself a hug, because i wish i could. i think you are amazing.


Awwh, I love you too! Big big love!!

We don't see a lot of homophobia around these parts. I mean in my day-to-day. We live in a pretty queer area, attend a queer-friendly church, and reside in the only state in the US that has marriage equality. So we don't really have to worry much, here, about hospital visiting and all of that. Which is nice. And usually people don't yell things like, "No gay marriage for f*cking gays!" like when we lived in Columbus.

But I guess the most recent thing was filing our taxes. Our taxes are such a HUGE pain in the butt because we are legally married in Massachusetts, yet the Federal Government does not recognize our marriage because of the Federal DOMA (thank you, Mr. Clinton). So we have to file a joint return to the state, and individual returns for the Feds. This means:

1. We can't file everything online because the online programs assume you have the same info for Feds and State, and we don't. So we do paper returns or we choose one to file online.

2. We have to do twice the work because first we do the separate returns, and then we have to RE-do it like we were filing jointly so we can import the data into the state return.

3. When it comes to the Fed return, we have to decide who claims the house interest deduction, who claims the baby, etc. And then run the risk of audit if they think it's weird that different women claim the kid in different years.

And honestly? It's unconstitutional and wrong that the Feds can do this, or that we have to have Jen adopt her own child even though she is already on the birth certificate because other states can do this, too. The Constitution has a Fair Faith and Credit clause that guarantees that if something is legal in one state, the other states have to go along with it. You know, except if your talking about marriage between a couple of dirty queers.

How do I deal with the tax thing? I get really annoyed. Really really annoyed.

Every year I say I'm going to include a letter with my taxes that states that I should be filing a joint return and paying more taxes but because the Feds refuse to recognize my legal marriage, they are losing out on some extra Big Gay Taxes. But... I never do. Because when push comes to shove I just want to get my returns in and get my money.
judecorp: (i'm special)
So part of my job that ISN'T mindless and boring and unskilled is the planning and leading of trainings for university staff people on LGBT issues - mainly student staff but not entirely. I don't always agree that standard "diversity trainings" are terribly helpful and sometimes they do little more than make people feel defensive, so it's kind of nice to have a hand in this sort of thing. And of course we all know I love the adolescents and young adults, so when I get to chat with a bunch of undergraduate workers, it's a good time.

A billion years ago when I was applying to social work school, I had an idea that I wanted to do more macro-level (big scale) work as opposed to micro-level (smaller scale, individual) work. Unlike most of my school peers, I never wanted to be a sit down therapist. Of course I wanted to be a superhero. But whatever. I'd thought about what sort of social work to study and thought that for me it would be better to actually STUDY clinical social work even with little desire to actually PRACTICE a lot of clinical social work. I always reasoned that the sorts of people skills that one could glean through a clinical social work program could be equally as valuable, if not more valuable, in a macro setting. Besides, I could always learn how to write grants in my spare time.

Doing these trainings with my boss have really shown me ways in which my relationship-building and communication skills have really helped with macro-level organizing, larger group facilitation, and more. To be able to look out into a larger crowd of people and make that sort of connection with the individuals as opposed to the greater group is a sort of technique that probably is underutilized in macro work. Anyway, I left that training last night feeling pretty darned good about how things had gone, that instead of some boring old powerpoint presentation on What It Means To Be a Nice Ally to Queers, I had facilitated a discussion about ACTION. And it was nice.

I still feel like I made the right choice in my education, and that's a pretty cool thing as well. (And hey, what can I say? I'm also hoping my boss noticed the energy in the meeting and is, at the very least, pleased that he passed these things onto me. Although a promotion would be nicer!)
judecorp: (strange place)
Oh my gosh, I can hardly stop laughing right now at the irony of it all.

Remember that dream job I applied for that I knew I would never get - the one for Director of the Stonewall Center at UMASS Amherst? (Yes, it would have been so perfect to have the Big Gay Job in the Big Gay Valley, le sigh.) Well, guess who got the job?

MY OLD FREAKING BOSS AT GLBTSS (Brett). My boss at OSU. My freaking boss at my big gay job at freaking OSU. Craziness. Peas gave me the heads up.

I dropped off a quick e-mail to offer my congratulations, welcome hir to Massachusetts, and offer advice on the area. And mentioned that I enjoyed working with hir and was proud of hir. BECAUSE I AM NOT ABOVE BEGGING FOR A JOB IF SIE WRITES BACK TO ME, THAT'S WHY!

I slay myself with my Big Gay Desperation.

Profile

judecorp: (Default)
judecorp

December 2011

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728 29 30 31

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 06:16 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios