(no subject)
Feb. 5th, 2008 01:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Barack Obama, June 5, 2006
And I should say that personally, I do believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Just in case y'all think he's a friend to the gays.
And I should say that personally, I do believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Just in case y'all think he's a friend to the gays.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:29 pm (UTC)re: friend of the gays
Date: 2008-02-05 07:12 pm (UTC)Include sexual orientation in anti-discrimination laws.
Let each denominations decide on recognizing gay marriage.
We need strong civil unions, not just weak civil unions.
The full text of the speech you quoted includes:
This debate is an attempt to break a consensus that is quietly being forged in this country. It's a consensus between Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, Red States and Blue States, that it's time for new leadership in this country - leadership that will stop dividing us, stop disappointing us, and start addressing the problems facing most Americans.
It's a consensus between a majority of Americans who say, "You know what, maybe some of us are comfortable with gay marriage right now and some of us are not. But most of us do believe that gay couples should be able to visit each other in the hospital and share health care benefits; most of us do believe that they should be treated with dignity and have their privacy respected by the federal government."
Re: friend of the gays
Date: 2008-02-05 07:32 pm (UTC)Just pointing out the facts. :)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:26 pm (UTC)I.just.don't.under.stand.
I hear that all the time from just about every politician and yet I'm no closer to seeing the logic. What does that mean? Why is marriage between a man and a woman? I even heard a "person" say that once! Clearly they were just repeating the things their television told them to as they could offer no further explanation however hard I pried.
Yeah. Obama. Just in case anyone though he was an actual person. :-
no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:34 pm (UTC)I can understand saying, "Maybe civil unions are better, blah blah blah, political talk," but I don't really understand the "Marriage is between one man and one woman" crap. I just don't. Maybe HIS marriage is, but mine isn't.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:37 pm (UTC)And yeah, I hope for that for you also. xo
no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:28 pm (UTC)I wish Canadian politicians could talk to American politicians on this issue. When same sex marriage became legal here I remember Chretian (prime minister at the time) saying something to the effect if it is illegal to discriminate then it is illegal to not allow certain people the choice to marry. It was met with opposition. But I think he used his veto power to basically tell everyone to shut up and there really is no debating this issue. And then everyone moved on.
And God didn't strike anyone dead.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:39 pm (UTC)And no - none of the front runners are speaking out in favor of same-sex marriage. Just the people who never stood a chance.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:34 pm (UTC)Hillary really isn't any better than Obama.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 07:50 pm (UTC)But what I want in a candidate is someone who has strong personal beliefs but DOESN'T think everyone else needs to hold them. I personally think it's atrocious for anyone to eat another creature, but if I were a politician, I wouldn't start drafting laws outlawing it, because I don't think everyone needs to agree with me. My personal beliefs aren't the same as what I think everyone in the country needs to follow in order for it to be a good country.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 08:46 pm (UTC)I am totally cool with a candidate having personal beliefs and different ideas for the country. I don't entirely think that's possible when you're talking about someone's spiritual beliefs all the time (some people can do it, not all people can), and in order to know if someone is the sort who can personally believe one thing and do another in practice, you need to have info about the practice.
That's where he's lacking for me.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 08:17 pm (UTC)Word.
(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-02-05 08:51 pm (UTC) - Expandno subject
Date: 2008-02-05 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 08:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 08:43 pm (UTC)I like to have info. INPUT. MORE INPUT NUMBER FIVE!
no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 10:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 03:21 am (UTC)BTW, in Germany, there's an actual civil ceremony (not just signing of a paper that you can drop off), so you have to have two ceremonies, one religious (or community-based), and one civil. Pretty cool, really.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-05 10:56 pm (UTC)I don't think I'm ever going to find a candidate, ANY candidate, whose beliefs and ideals exactly match mine. I have to try to choose who will do the best on behalf of EVERYONE, or at the very least, the less harm (like 4 years ago).
I'm sorry that this is still an issue for anyone...you should be able to marry who you love without the government playing Tetris with your genitals. Period.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 02:34 am (UTC)Barack, as has been said, sounds *hopeful.* Like no-one else since ... probably since before I was born. I guess I'm a sucker for optimism, after having my genitals become the target of a gas-powered pitchfork gun for eight years running. (Seriously, his re-election was the day after my birthday. 'Happy birthday, queer! You're even more not-a-person!' Ugh.)
no subject
Date: 2008-02-06 01:35 pm (UTC)I'm backing Obama
Date: 2008-02-06 07:48 pm (UTC)Maybe you're another racist "progressive" white lesbian who would never vote for Obama when a white woman candidate is available
from: http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/Hillary_Clinton_Civil_Rights.htm
Hillary supports DOMA, which Bill Clinton signed
Hillary stated categorically that she opposed legalizing same-sex marriage. She provided a clear explanation that to this day is the most quoted statement enunciating her position. "Marriage has historic, religious, and moral content that goes back to the beginning of time, and I think a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman. But I also believe that people in committed gay marriages, as they believe them to be, should be given rights under the law that recognize and respect their relationship."
Hillary said she backed her husband's signing of the Defense of Marriage Act. She said what everyone wanted to know: Yes, if she had been in the Senate in 1996, she would have supported the law.
Re: I'm backing Obama
Date: 2008-02-06 10:56 pm (UTC)Step off.
Re: I'm backing Obama
From:Re: I'm backing Obama
From:Re: I'm backing Obama
From:Re: I'm backing Obama
From:Re: I'm backing Obama
From:Re: I'm backing Obama
From:Re: I'm backing Obama
From:Re: I'm backing Obama
From:no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 07:34 pm (UTC)And so did I, and so did our BLACK Daughter.
Whatever.
Sheesh.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-12 08:33 pm (UTC)Punk voted for Hillary, too.